Wednesday, April 1, 2015

FW: MOPH Chapter 711 - April Meeting


 If you understand, Things are just as they are. 
If you do not understand, Things are just as they are.





Subject: Fw: MOPH Chapter 711 - April Meeting

Patriots,
Just to remind you that this coming Saturday, April 4,  is the monthly meeting date for MOPH Chapter 711.  This month's meeting will be held at the following location:                                                                                 
IHOP Restaurant
9651 Trailwood Drive
Las Vegas, NV 89134
This restaurant is located in Summerlin where we have the July 4th Parade.
We will meet at 9:00 a.m. for breakfast and/or coffee.  We will each be responsible for our own check + tip.
If you want to order breakfast we will see you at 9:00 a.m.  -- if you just want to come for our regular meeting we will see you at 10:00 a.m.  However, please know that if you want to come and spend some time talking before the meeting but don't want to have breakfast and/or coffee, please feel free to do so.
Call if you have any questions.
John Waid
Commander
Telephone: 702-869-4186


____________________________________________________________
Old School Yearbook Pics
View Class Yearbooks Online Free. Search by School & Year. Look Now!
classmates.com

FW: AGENT ORANGE EXPOSURE APPEARS TO DOUBLE RISK OF INVASIVE SKIN CAN CER (IOM doesn't recognize study)

FYI and dissemination as appropriate.

FRANK VAN HOY
National Service Director
Military Order of the Purple Heart
5413-B Backlick Road, Springfield, VA 22151
O: 703.642.5360


 
 
By Annette M. Boyle
 
HOUSTON â€" Even four decades later, veterans exposed to Agent Orange during the Vietnam War have twice the risk of developing unusually invasive nonmelanotic skin cancers compared with the general population, according to a recent study.
 
“We noticed a lot of veterans coming into our clinic had very aggressive squamous and basal cell carcinomas, and it seemed like there was a connection to Agent Orange exposure, but a literature search failed to find any studies that showed an association in humans,” said Mark Clemens, MD, assistant professor of plastic surgery, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center.
Previous studies have demonstrated a positive correlation between 2-, 3-, 7-, 8-tetrachlorodibenzodioxin (TCDD), the highly toxic contaminant in Agent Orange and nonmelanotic invasive skin in animals.
 
As of 2009, more than 485,000 veterans with Agent Orange exposure had registered with the VA. DoD and the VA recognize and provide benefits for many TCDD exposure-associated diseases, including peripheral neuropathy, amyloidosis, B-cell leukemia, birth defects, chronic lymphocytic leukemia, type 2 diabetes mellitus, Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphoma, ischemic heart disease, multiple myeloma, Parkinson’s disease, porphyria cutanea tarda, prostate cancer, respiratory cancers, soft-tissue sarcomas and chloracne.-
 
A U.S. Huey helicopter spraying Agent Orange over Vietnam.A U.S. Huey helicopter spraying Agent Orange over Vietnam.
 
Currently, however, skin cancer is not presumptively associated with Agent Orange exposure. The latest Institute of Medicine update to the Veterans and Agent Orange report concluded that there is “inadequate and insufficient information to determine whether there is an association between exposure to Agent Orange and basal cell or squamous cell cancer.”1
 
That didn't dissuade the M.D. Anderson researchers from further investigation.
 
“In our clinic, we talked about an association on a daily basis. We wanted to systematically take the first step toward conclusively making that case,” Clemens said. “We did a pilot study with 100 consecutive patients and found a surprisingly high rate of 51% of veterans had nonmelanotic skin cancer, which is about twice what you would see in an age-matched cohort in the general population,” Clemens told U.S. Medicine.
 
The researchers evaluated the medical records of patients who enrolled in the Agent Orange registry at the Washington, DC, VAMC from August 2009 to January 2010. The patients ranged in age from 56 to 80 years old, with a mean age of 65.7 years. Only patients with Fitzpatrick skin types I-IV (fair to medium complexions) were included in the study. The results of the study appeared in the February issue of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery.2
 
“We compared whether they sprayed fields every day, lived and worked in the area or traversed a field once as part of work and then looked at the incidence by group,” Clemens said. Among the 30% of patients who actively sprayed Agent Orange, the risk of skin cancer was even higher â€" 73%. Of those who lived or worked in areas sprayed with the chemical, 46% had nonmelanotic invasive skin cancer (NMISC). For veterans who reported only traveling through areas exposed to Agent Orange, the rate dropped to 21%.
 
About 43% of patients had chloracne, known to be caused by dioxin exposure. The presence of chloracne increased the rate of NMISC substantially, to 80%. Cutaneous melanoma occurred in 9% of the patients, similar to the 8.8% rate seen in individuals over the age of 65 in the general population. More than one-fourth of the patients (26%) had other malignancies.
 
Men with lighter skin and light eye color also had increased risk. Of the 14 men with Fitzpatrick skin type I, the lightest, 10 (71%) had NMISC. Just under 60% of those with Fitzpatrick skin type II and 45% of those with type III had NMISC, while none of those with skin type IV did. Of the 38 veterans with blue eyes, 66% (25) had NMISC, as did 60% (9) of those with green or hazel eyes. The incidence rate was much lower in veterans with brown eyes, at 36%.
 
“The takeaway from the study is that there may be an association between Agent Orange and development of nonmelanotic skin cancer, but it needs to be studied on a larger scale with thousands of patients. What we’ve observed is very, very suspicious and supports what’s been reported anecdotally,” Clemens noted.
 
Clemens said he and his colleagues are hoping to enroll patients in a larger, prospective study. The researchers pointed out that their study had some significant limitations, such as reliance on recalled TCDD exposure and the absence of a control group of nonexposed Vietnam-era veterans.
 
While research continues, Clemens encouraged physicians to closely monitor veterans with Agent Orange exposure for skin cancers.
 
“Most patients in this group don’t fall under the screening regimen. They may not have a family history of skin cancer; they’re over 65. Even if there isn’t a formal screening recommendation, veterans exposed to Agent Orange should have a physician look them over from head to toe and check any areas where they might have skin cancer,” he suggested.
 
“It’s difficult with just 100 patients to stratify subcohorts to determine who is most or least at risk, but the incidence was clearly higher among individuals with fair skin and light eyes,” Clemens added. “We can say that we really need additional study to determine the relative risk within this group and how we might best help these veterans.”
 
1 National Research Council. Veterans and Agent Orange: Update 2012. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2014.
2 Clemens MW, Kochuba AL, Carter ME, Han K, Liu J, Evans K. Association between Agent Orange Exposure and Nonmelanotic Invasive Skin Cancer: A Pilot Study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014 Feb;133(2):432-7.
 


 If you understand, Things are just as they are. 
If you do not understand, Things are just as they are.





FRANK VAN HOY
National Service Director
Military Order of the Purple Heart
5413-B Backlick Road, Springfield, VA 22151
O: 703.642.5360




By Annette M. Boyle

HOUSTON — Even four decades later, veterans exposed to Agent Orange during the Vietnam War have twice the risk of developing unusually invasive nonmelanotic skin cancers compared with the general population, according to a recent study.

"We noticed a lot of veterans coming into our clinic had very aggressive squamous and basal cell carcinomas, and it seemed like there was a connection to Agent Orange exposure, but a literature search failed to find any studies that showed an association in humans," said Mark Clemens, MD, assistant professor of plastic surgery, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center.
Previous studies have demonstrated a positive correlation between 2-, 3-, 7-, 8-tetrachlorodibenzodioxin (TCDD), the highly toxic contaminant in Agent Orange and nonmelanotic invasive skin in animals.

As of 2009, more than 485,000 veterans with Agent Orange exposure had registered with the VA. DoD and the VA recognize and provide benefits for many TCDD exposure-associated diseases, including peripheral neuropathy, amyloidosis, B-cell leukemia, birth defects, chronic lymphocytic leukemia, type 2 diabetes mellitus, Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphoma, ischemic heart disease, multiple myeloma, Parkinson's disease, porphyria cutanea tarda, prostate cancer, respiratory cancers, soft-tissue sarcomas and chloracne.-

A U.S. Huey helicopter spraying Agent Orange over Vietnam.

Currently, however, skin cancer is not presumptively associated with Agent Orange exposure. The latest Institute of Medicine update to the Veterans and Agent Orange report concluded that there is "inadequate and insufficient information to determine whether there is an association between exposure to Agent Orange and basal cell or squamous cell cancer."1

That didn't dissuade the M.D. Anderson researchers from further investigation.

"In our clinic, we talked about an association on a daily basis. We wanted to systematically take the first step toward conclusively making that case," Clemens said. "We did a pilot study with 100 consecutive patients and found a surprisingly high rate of 51% of veterans had nonmelanotic skin cancer, which is about twice what you would see in an age-matched cohort in the general population," Clemens told U.S. Medicine.

The researchers evaluated the medical records of patients who enrolled in the Agent Orange registry at the Washington, DC, VAMC from August 2009 to January 2010. The patients ranged in age from 56 to 80 years old, with a mean age of 65.7 years. Only patients with Fitzpatrick skin types I-IV (fair to medium complexions) were included in the study. The results of the study appeared in the February issue of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery.2

"We compared whether they sprayed fields every day, lived and worked in the area or traversed a field once as part of work and then looked at the incidence by group," Clemens said. Among the 30% of patients who actively sprayed Agent Orange, the risk of skin cancer was even higher — 73%. Of those who lived or worked in areas sprayed with the chemical, 46% had nonmelanotic invasive skin cancer (NMISC). For veterans who reported only traveling through areas exposed to Agent Orange, the rate dropped to 21%.

About 43% of patients had chloracne, known to be caused by dioxin exposure. The presence of chloracne increased the rate of NMISC substantially, to 80%. Cutaneous melanoma occurred in 9% of the patients, similar to the 8.8% rate seen in individuals over the age of 65 in the general population. More than one-fourth of the patients (26%) had other malignancies.

Men with lighter skin and light eye color also had increased risk. Of the 14 men with Fitzpatrick skin type I, the lightest, 10 (71%) had NMISC. Just under 60% of those with Fitzpatrick skin type II and 45% of those with type III had NMISC, while none of those with skin type IV did. Of the 38 veterans with blue eyes, 66% (25) had NMISC, as did 60% (9) of those with green or hazel eyes. The incidence rate was much lower in veterans with brown eyes, at 36%.

"The takeaway from the study is that there may be an association between Agent Orange and development of nonmelanotic skin cancer, but it needs to be studied on a larger scale with thousands of patients. What we've observed is very, very suspicious and supports what's been reported anecdotally," Clemens noted.

Clemens said he and his colleagues are hoping to enroll patients in a larger, prospective study. The researchers pointed out that their study had some significant limitations, such as reliance on recalled TCDD exposure and the absence of a control group of nonexposed Vietnam-era veterans.

While research continues, Clemens encouraged physicians to closely monitor veterans with Agent Orange exposure for skin cancers.

"Most patients in this group don't fall under the screening regimen. They may not have a family history of skin cancer; they're over 65. Even if there isn't a formal screening recommendation, veterans exposed to Agent Orange should have a physician look them over from head to toe and check any areas where they might have skin cancer," he suggested.

"It's difficult with just 100 patients to stratify subcohorts to determine who is most or least at risk, but the incidence was clearly higher among individuals with fair skin and light eyes," Clemens added. "We can say that we really need additional study to determine the relative risk within this group and how we might best help these veterans."



FW: Lawsuit Challenging Parts of the Final VA "Standard Claims and Appeals Form" Rules


 If you understand, Things are just as they are. 
If you do not understand, Things are just as they are.





Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2015 19:22:03 +0000
To: rserge1@outlook.com
Subject: Fw: Re: Lawsuit Challenging Parts of the Final VA "Standard Claims and Appeals Form" Rules



All,
Hopefully this email will answer many of your questions and alleviate any concerns you may have regarding this lawsuit.
The law firm representing the legal action is Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP ("WilmerHale") through its Washington, DC office. Parties to this legal action include the National Veterans Legal Services Program, The American Legion, AMVETS, The Military Order of the Purple Heart, and Vietnam Veterans of America. WilmerHale is representing this matter on a pro bono basis. 
The proposed challenge in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit is to two aspects of the rules promulgated by the Office of Veterans Affairs ("VA") on September 24, 2014, which became effective on March 24, 2015: (a) the elimination of the VA's existing "informal claim" process; and (b) the elimination of the VA's duty to infer benefit claims for disabilities when entitlement to service connection for the disabilities is reasonably raised by the evidence of record even though these disabilities are not "related" to the expressly claimed disabilities.
WilmerHale's brief statement of the case is as follows:
               "Background:  On September 25, 2014, the VA published final rules that amend Parts 3, 19, and 20 of 38 C.F.R.  See 79 Fed. Reg. 57660-57698.  These final rules on what VA calls "Standard Claims and Appeals Forms" will become effective on March 24, 2015.   Congress has provided that a lawsuit challenging a VA rule may be filed directly in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.  NVLSP and several other veterans service organizations (VSOs) wish to challenge certain parts of these rules (hereinafter the "new rules").
               "Challenge #1:  For decades prior to these new rules, a veteran could begin a claim for benefits in one of two ways: by filing with the VA (a) a written document (like a letter sent by USPS) expressing an intent to file a claim for benefits (called an informal claim) or (b) the application form that VA has for the particular benefit sought (called a formal claim).  The VA would typically send a formal claim form to the veteran who filed an informal claim and give the veteran a year within which to file the formal claim form.  If the claim initially initiated by an informal claim was ultimately granted, the effective date for the award of benefits would usually be the date VA received the informal claim, not the later date of receipt of the formal claim form.
                The new rules eliminate the informal claim.  Under the new rules, an award of benefits can be no earlier than the date the VA receives (a) an electronically submitted formal claim form; (b) a paper formal claim form; (c) a new form called a form indicating an intent to file a claim for benefits; or (d) an oral statement of intent to file a claim, but only if (i) the oral communication is "directed to a VA employee designated to receive such a communication" and (ii) the VA employee documents the date the employee received the oral communication.  This means that if VA receives from a veteran a letter expressing a desire for a particular benefit, receipt of that letter can no longer serve to establish the earliest effective date if the VA ultimately awards the benefit.  The VA will send a formal claim form to a veteran who submits a letter requesting benefits, but the earliest possible effective date will be the date the formal claim form is received by VA.
                The new rules eliminating the informal claim harms low-income and disabled veterans who (a) do not have access to and know how to use a computer (b) are not located near a VA facility that has copies of VA claims forms, and (c) do not have access to a telephone.  For example, a homeless, impoverished, disabled veteran who lives in a rural area is at a significant disadvantage compared to those who can navigate the internet, own a telephone, or live near a VA facility that has VA claims forms.  If that vet sends the VA a letter asking for a particular type of benefit, VA receipt of that letter will have no impact on the effective date.  Even if the homeless vet provides an address of a friend to which the VA could send a claims form, it may take months for the VA to respond by sending a claims form and for the homeless vet to file the form that will serve to establish the earliest possible effective date.
     NVLSP and the other VSOs wish to challenge the elimination of an informal claim that serves to set the earliest effective date as inconsistent with VA's statutory authority and a violation of the Fifth Amendment's guarantee of equal protection.
      "Challenge #2: Congress, the courts, and the VA have all long agreed that the VA claims adjudication process is intended to be non-adversarial and pro-claimant and that the VA has a duty to assist a veteran-claimant obtain the evidence necessary to substantiate the claim.  The VA has long taken the position when it considers a veteran's claim for a particular service connected disability (disability X), and the record reveals that the veteran is entitled to service-connected disability benefits for a different disability (disability Y), the VA has a duty to adjudicate the veteran's entitlement to service connection for disability Y, even though the veteran never requested benefits for disability Y.  Thus, if a Vietnam veteran files a claim for service connection for PTSD and the record reveals that the veteran suffers from type 2 diabetes, the VA would have an obligation when adjudicating the PTSD claim to also adjudicate entitlement to service connection for type 2 diabetes since VA regulations provide that a Vietnam veterans who manifests type 2 diabetes is entitled to service connected disability benefits for type 2 diabetes.
     In VA's commentary to the final rules, VA stated regarding the scope of a claim filed pursuant to the new rules that VA will continue to "infer or identify and award certain benefits that a claimant has not expressly requested but that are related to a claimed condition and there is evidence of record indicating entitlement."  79 Fed. Reg. 57692.  However, VA stated that "entirely separate conditions never identified on a standard claim form generally will not be the subject of claims that are reasonable raised by the evidence of record."  Id.  Thus, VA in effect takes the position that in the above example, it is not obligated to adjudicate whether the veteran is entitled to service connected disability benefits for type 2 diabetes because the veteran never filed a claim for benefit for type 2 diabetes and type 2 diabetes is unrelated to PTSD.
     NVLSP and the other VSOs wish to challenge VA's elimination in the new rules of VA's duty to infer benefit claims for disabilities when entitlement to service connection for the disabilities is  reasonably raised by the evidence of record even though these disabilities are not "related" to the expressly claimed disabilities."
This action in no way affects the VA's Fully Developed Claim (FDC) process - "Quick Claim Procedure". The FDC is separate and distinct. MOPH is NOT advocating modification/elimination of the FDC process. MOPH is, in fact, a strong advocate of the FDC process.
If there are further questions/comments, please contact me.
Yours in Patriotism,
FRANK VAN HOY
National Service Director
Military Order of the Purple Heart
5413-B Backlick Road, Springfield, VA 22151
O: 703.642.5360


____________________________________________________________
Old School Yearbook Pics
View Class Yearbooks Online Free. Search by School & Year. Look Now!
classmates.com

Tuesday, March 31, 2015

Fisher House Ground Braking






Members of the Nevada Veterans Foundation at the groundbreaking ceremonies for the Las Vegas Fisher House Others from the left are Dr Roy Kekahuna BVA, Bob Garlow VFW, Len Yelinik MOPH, Jim McCawley CWV, Bob Couchie DAV, Richard Small MOPH and Karen Estabrook Am Leg. Not pictured but present is Dick Moyer MOPH. NVF will continue to support the guests of the Las Vegas Fisher House after it is donated to the Southern Nevada VA Health Care System upon completion less than a year from now. A dream comes true for all of us

Thursday, March 19, 2015

FW: Wendesday, 18 March 2015



Ya' know, every once in a while something comes along that is just perfect!!!
We are here on earth to do good unto others. What the others are here for, I have no idea. 


To: rserge1@outlook.com
Subject: Fwd: Wendesday, 18 March 2015




Zach,  Herald & Review  After eBay spotting and long journey, WWII pilot's possessions end up with family.  You just never know when you're going to bump into the last traces of a real hero. That's true even for experts such as Dan Janvrin, who is used to sifting through the bits and pieces of their lives. 
 Did you know:
-      Department of Defense Warrior Games 2015. 
-      Army picks female intelligence soldier for USAREUR's top enlisted slot. 
-      Tricare to No Longer Cover Some Prescription Pain Killers.   
-      White House office to delete its FOIA regulations. 
-      McCain: GOP can't afford to defer defense spending debate.
-      House GOP taps war fund to solve defense spending cap. 
-      DOD explores changes to 5-year rule, LQA. 
-      Quality of life for Vets. 
-      House vets chairman: VA impeding congressional oversight. 
-      VA, Congress trade barbs over trust, transparency. 
-      VA Watchdog overhauls policies on investigative report. 
-      US Sets New Record for Denying, Censoring Government Files. 
-      Special Report: Traumatic Brain Injury.  
-      Obama talks about trust at VA scandal site. 
-      Colorado VA Hospital Construction is More Than $1 Billion Over Budget. 
-      Cost of new Denver-area VA hospital swells fivefold to $1.73 billion. 
-      Estimated cost of new Denver VA hospital balloons to $1.73B. 
-      Veterans Affairs Wants A Disney Run Hospital. 
-      Veterans Group Launches Social Network to Put Personal Dave on VA Scandal. 
-      Elder Law: Department of Veterans Affairs proposes 3-year look-back for gifts. 
-      Bad advice? VA wants retirement home resident to repay $45,000. 
-      Facebook's suicide prevention tools connect friends, test privacy. 
-      Civil War re-enactors bring history to life at Fayetteville exhibit. 
-      After eBay spotting and long journey, WWII pilot's possessions end up with family. 
Did you know:
Military Medicine, VA aim to share more patients in San Antonio:  In a move that helps veterans, and active-duty military patients and their families, local VA and military medical facilities have dramatically increased their work-share agreements over the past two years and they are seeking to add more.
Department of Defense Warrior Games 2015.  The Department of Defense Warrior Games 2015 will take place June 19 - 28 at Marine Corps Base Quantico, Virginia.  DoD Warrior Games is an annual sporting competition bringing together wounded, ill and injured service members and veterans from across the country.  This is the first year that the department is organizing the games, which were previously run by the United States Olympic Committee and held at
Army picks female intelligence soldier for USAREUR's top enlisted slot.  U.S. Army Europe's Lt. Gen. Ben Hodges has selected Command Sgt. Major Sheryl Lyon as the next senior enlisted leader for U.S. Army Europe, breaking new ground for a position that until now has always been held by male combat arms soldiers.
Military.com  Tricare to No Longer Cover Some Prescription Pain Killers.  Tricare officials are rolling out a new prescription drug clearance system that will block from coverage some ingredients used in compounded medications like pain killers, officials announced March 13. 
USA Today   White House office to delete its FOIA regulations.  The White House is removing a federal regulation that subjects its Office of Administration to the Freedom of Information Act, making official a policy under Presidents Bush and Obama to reject requests for records to that office. 
The Hill   McCain: GOP can't afford to defer defense spending debate.  Sen. John McCain (Ariz.) is keeping up the pressure on his fellow Republicans to lift spending caps for the Defense Department. 
House GOP taps war fund to solve defense spending cap.  Fiscal hawks in the House on Tuesday proposed pumping billions into the military's emergency overseas war fund as a way to circumvent a mandatory limit on base defense spending that the services warn will damage national security and readiness.
DOD explores changes to 5-year rule, LQA.  The Defense Department is considering new limits to housing allowances for civilian employees as it reviews a benefit that costs the government about $500 million annually.
TribLIVE: Quality of life for Vets.  If H.R. 969 is passed, it will afford proper, equitable VA benefits to Vietnam veterans exposed to Agent Orange. Thousands of Vietnam veterans who did not have boots on the ground will be eligible for benefits and compensation.
House vets chairman: VA impeding congressional oversight.  Rep. Jeff Miller, R-Fla., has accused the inspector general and other officials at the Department of Veterans Affairs of withholding reports from his panel, despite pledges to be transparent.
Military Times: VA, Congress trade barbs over trust, transparency.  A year after the Veterans Affairs Department was rocked by findings of hidden patient wait lists and manipulated records, House Republicans are accusing the department's new leadership of doing little to fix the transparency problems.
USA Today: VA Watchdog overhauls policies on investigative report.  The chief watchdog at the Veterans Affairs Department is overhauling its policies for making public the findings of dozens of investigations into veterans' health care… Acting VA Inspector General Richard Griffin announced Tuesday that all decisions about whether to release investigative reports will now be made by his immediate staff.
The New York Times (AP): US Sets New Record for Denying, Censoring Government Files.  Obama administration more often than ever censored government files or outright denied access to them… records showed Veterans Affairs doctors concluding that a gunman who later killed 12 people had no mental health issues despite serious problems and encounters with police during the same period.
Special Report: Traumatic Brain Injury.   Traumatic brain injury is one of the invisible wounds of war and one of the signature injuries of troops wounded in Afghanistan and Iraq. This Defense.gov special report highlights the Defense Department's efforts to care for wounded warriors suffering from this condition while …
The Washington Post (Federal Eye): Obama talks about trust at VA scandal site.  President Obama went to the scene of the misdeeds when he visited the Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center in Phoenix on Friday… Obama visited Phoenix not to claim victory that the afflicted agency had been healed, but to inspect the repair job.
Wall Street Journal: Colorado VA Hospital Construction is More Than $1 Billion Over Budget.  A Department of Veterans Affairs hospital in Colorado will be more than $1 billion over budget before the project is completed, according to new estimates released by the department Tuesday… The medical center in Aurora, Colo., is now projected to cost $1.73 billion, nearly three times its original budgeted amount with the contractor.
Stars and Stripes (AP): Cost of new Denver-area VA hospital swells fivefold to $1.73 billion.  The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs announced Tuesday that it will cost $1.73 billion to build a VA hospital in the Denver suburb of Aurora — more than five times its initial $328 million price tag… Work resumed under an interim contract after the VA enlisted the Army Corps of Engineers as project advisers.
The Washington Times (AP): Estimated cost of new Denver VA hospital balloons to $1.73B.  The Department of Veterans Affairs says it will cost $1.73 billion to build a VA hospital in the Denver suburb of Aurora - more than five times its initial $328 million price tag… The Denver Post reports the new cost estimate, which VA Deputy Secretary Sloan Gibson revealed to Colorado lawmakers Tuesday, is the latest development in the project that has been in development for more than a decade and has suffered huge cost overruns and delays.
DisabledVeterans.org: Veterans Affairs Wants A Disney Run Hospital.  Four weeks ago, we first heard Veterans Affairs Secretary Robert McDonald has been pushing Disney ideals onto veterans, and that the Disney love affair did not start with him… Disney is apparently behind the MyVA and ICARE platform proposed by Secretary McDonald to help VA employees be friendlier with veterans and their family members.
BuzzFeed: Veterans Group Launches Social Network to Put Personal Dave on VA Scandal.  A veterans group has created a new way for service members to put pressure on the Veterans Administration as complaints of long lines and substandard care continue to plague the VA… The Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America will launch TheWaitWeCarry.org Tuesday, a social network that lets veterans post personal stories of seeking and receiving care at VA facilities around the United States.
Houston Chronicle: Elder Law: Department of Veterans Affairs proposes 3-year look-back for gifts.  On Jan. 23, the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) proposed to amend its regulations governing entitlement to VA Pension. The VA helps veterans and their families by providing supplemental tax-free income through the Veterans Pension benefit.
The Modesto Bee: Bad advice? VA wants retirement home resident to repay $45,000.  Debera Fathke said an adviser at the Standiford Place retirement center in Modesto helped obtain veterans benefits for residents, including her mother, who was granted $1,100 a month in 2011 to supplement her retirement income.
Minnesota Public Radio News: Facebook's suicide prevention tools connect friends, test privacy.  Facebook is the latest social media network to roll out support resources for suicide prevention. The company is now trying to combat suicide by doing what it does best — connecting friends… one initiative is deploying this big data to predict the suicide risk of veteran soldiers by monitoring social media posts among other behavioral factors.
Civil War re-enactors bring history to life at Fayetteville exhibit.  The exhibit continues this afternoon with displays of weapons, clothing, toiletries and other items that the soldiers of the 1860s carried across country and into battle.
Herald & Review  After eBay spotting and long journey, WWII pilot's possessions end up with family.  You just never know when you're going to bump into the last traces of a real hero. That's true even for experts such as Dan Janvrin, who is used to sifting through the bits and pieces of their lives. 

FW: Golden Age Games Open Registration





FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
March 18, 2015

Applications Accepted for 2015 National Veterans Golden Age Games
Event Takes Place in Omaha, Nebraska, Aug. 8-12

Washington – The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) is currently accepting applications from Veterans interested in competing in the 2015 National Veterans Golden Age Games. Applications can be completed online at www.veteransgoldenagegames.va.gov, and will be accepted through May 15. Veterans ages 55 and older who are enrolled for VA care are eligible to participate.
The 2015 National Veterans Golden Age Games takes place in Omaha, Nebraska, Aug. 8-12. Nearly 800 athletes are expected to compete in the national multi-event sports and recreational competition for senior Veterans. The event encourages participants to make physical activity a central part of their lives, and supports VA's comprehensive recreation and rehabilitation therapy programs. Competitive events include air rifle, badminton, bowling, cycling, dominoes, field, golf, horseshoes, nine ball, shuffleboard, swimming, table tennis and track.
VA research and clinical experience verify that physical activity is important to maintaining good health, speeding recovery and improving overall quality of life. The games also serve as a way for participants to continue in local senior events in their home communities.
VA Nebraska-Western Iowa Health Care System will host this year's games. The health care system provides care for more than 55,000 Veterans from 101 counties in Nebraska, western Iowa and portions of Missouri and Kansas.
For more information visit www.veteransgoldenagegames.va.gov and follow VA Adaptive Sports on Twitter at @VAAdaptiveSport or on Facebook at www.facebook.com/vaadaptivesports.


###






--




Ernesto P. Hernandez III

National Adjutant

Military Order of the Purple Heart

703-642-5360 X119



FW: Purple Heart






   
Ya' know, every once in a while something comes along that is just perfect!!!
We are here on earth to do good unto others. What the others are here for, I have no idea. 



Subject: Fwd: Purple Heart

Marine Slain By Friendly Fire in Vietnam to Be Awarded Purple Heart

Cpl. Conrad Lerman (WMF.ORG)
Cpl. Conrad Lerman (WMF.ORG)
Stars and Stripes | Mar 16, 2015
A Marine who was one of three killed when their helicopter was shot down by friendly fire during the Vietnam War will soon be awarded a Purple Heart, culminating a decades long effort by the only survivor to secure the recognition for his crewmates, The New York Times reported Saturday.
Dan Jones, a Marine first lieutenant in 1968, was co-piloting the helicopter, which was carrying supplies to troops, when it was shot down accidentally by an American howitzer. The howitzer had been "firing continuous rounds in support of heavily engaged Marines," according to an affidavit written last year by Capt. James T. Butler, another pilot from the squadron, who investigated the crash, The Times reported.
Jones was informed while recovering from severe injuries that his three dead crewmates — 1st Lt. Glenn J. Zamorski, who was in command on the flight; Sgt. Raymond W, Templeton, the crew chief; and Cpl. Conrad Lerman, who was manning a .50-caliber machine gun — would not be awarded Purple Heart medals, the Times reported. Jones twice asked the Marines to issue the medals for his dead comrades, but was told that victims of "friendly fire" were excluded.
"I dropped it, thinking there was pretty much no hope," Jones, now 70 and living in Arizona, told the Times.
In 1993, Congress expanded eligibility after learning some victims of friendly fire in the first Gulf War had been awarded Purple Hearts but others had not, Fred L. Borch, a retired Army colonel and historian of American medals and decorations, told the Times.
Jones learned of the change and his crew's eligibility for the medal after he and other veterans began sharing records and memories of the incident in 2013. Nevertheless, Jones feared the awards would not be issued. "I've been hauling around these letters and such for forty-some years," the Times said he wrote in an email from the time.
But last year, George Ross, another fellow pilot from the squadron, called Jones after submitting documents to the Marine Corps to tell him the entire crew would be awarded Purple Hearts.
"My reaction to that call was pretty much the same as it is now," Jones told The Times. "I cried. I was at a loss for words.
"They were my buddies," he told the paper. "I felt their deaths needed to be honored, and as the surviving crewmember it was my responsibility to make sure that occurred."
Jones and two of his crew have since been awarded the medal, the Times reported. Lerman's medal is likely to be presented during a family reunion in the summer, the Times quoted Maj. Rob Dolan, a Marine Corps spokesman, as saying.
"The Purple Heart is absolutely an appropriate recognition of their courageous service and sacrifice to our nation," Dolan said, according to the Times. "This is closing a tragic story from the Vietnam era."

Related Topics